Product Description
The Moleskine 18 Month Weekly Notebook, soft cover large, is dated from July 2009 to December 2010. Formatted to show the week's appointments on the left and a ruled page for notes and ideas on the right, this popular planner style is perfect for students and professionals.
This Moleskine planner is thread bound and has a soft cover with rounded corners, acid free paper, a bookmark, an elastic closure and an expandable inner pocket that contains the Moleskine history.
Moleskine Academic Weekly Notebook July 2009 - December 2010 18 Month Soft Black Large (Moleskine Srl) ![]()
I love this planner. Big spaces on the days and a full page for notes or my many to do lists! I highly rec any Moleskine product because they more than live up to their name!
Great planner ![]()
I had previously had a school year planner, so this planner was a perfect transition to a yearly one. The planner is pretty sturdy, and there is plenty of space to write.
Amazing! ![]()
It is the prefect size to actually fit information and details for a variety of tasks, while still small enough to fit in my purse. Its set-up is perfect for planning and taking notes or jotting down ideas in the same place!
An excellent tool for time management ![]()
For me, at least.
I need a paper planner for a number of reasons, but the most important to me is that I'm a tactile kind of person and like to hold the book not look at a screen, and that the act of writing helps me remember appointments and tasks where typing does not.
The seven days of the week on one side and a lined page on the other is the best format for me. I have relatively few appointments, but many tasks per week that go on the lined page.
I've had Moleskine products with the soft cover, and they are OK for light use, but I carry and use a planner almost constantly. This lost the planner a half a star. Regardless, the hard cover stands up to this use better.
Other planners have the address book that slips into the pocket in back. I miss that, and that is what lost this product the rest of that star.
The pocket size (3.5 in by 5.5 in)just doesn't have enough space, and if I cram it, the writing is too hard on the eyes. This one, the large book is about 8 in by 5 in, and much more comfortable to write in and read, while not being excessively bulky.
The spare blank pages, the year overview calendar, and the pocket inside the back cover are above and beyond what I expect in a planner, but I have grown accustomed to them and use them regularly.
Excellent tool, and I recommend it to anyone who prefers (or might prefer) a physical rather than virtual planner.
E. M. Van Court
RELATED: